Skip to content
</>Devs At Home
← All reviewers

6 Months Later

25 videos analysed · channel 9.4 years old · 298K subscribers

  • High share of commercially influenced output
  • Describes rather than measures
  • Channel less than a year old

Score breakdown

Each signal is scored 0–100 and multiplied by its published weight. The contributions sum to 35.

  • Disclosure

    50 × 25% = 12.5

    States plainly when a unit was gifted, paid for, or sponsored.

  • Methodology

    16 × 25% = 4

    Measures and tests rather than unboxing and describing.

  • Independence

    20 × 20% = 4

    Share of output that carries no commercial relationship.

  • Longevity

    53 × 10% = 5.3

    Revisits gear months later instead of reviewing once at launch.

  • Consistency

    46 × 10% = 4.6

    Publishes on a predictable cadence within a coherent subject.

  • Engagement

    44 × 10% = 4.4

    Audience discussion is proportionate and substantive for the reach.

The videos this score came from

Every phrase quoted below was found in that video's own title or description. Nothing here is inferred.

Scores are computed from public YouTube metadata by an open rubric and refreshed when our enrichment job runs. They measure disclosure and process, not whether a conclusion is correct. If you own this channel and believe a signal is mismeasured, tell us — the inputs are auditable and we will correct them.