Skip to content
← All reviewers

engineericly

videos analysed

  • Reviews at launch, rarely revisits
  • Channel less than a year old

Score breakdown

Each signal is scored 0–100 and multiplied by its published weight. The contributions sum to 55.

  • Disclosure

    75 × 25% = 18.8

    States plainly when a unit was gifted, paid for, or sponsored.

  • Methodology

    42 × 25% = 10.5

    Measures and tests rather than unboxing and describing.

  • Independence

    100 × 20% = 20

    Share of output that carries no commercial relationship.

  • Longevity

    5 × 10% = 0.5

    Revisits gear months later instead of reviewing once at launch.

  • Consistency

    13 × 10% = 1.3

    Publishes on a predictable cadence within a coherent subject.

  • Engagement

    38 × 10% = 3.8

    Audience discussion is proportionate and substantive for the reach.

The videos this score came from

Every phrase quoted below was found in that video's own title or description. Nothing here is inferred.

  • Fully 3D Printed Battery Magazine

    Fully 3D Printed Battery Magazine

    Oct 24, 2025 · 1 min · 7.4M views Short — excluded from methodology

Scores are computed from public YouTube metadata by an open rubric and refreshed when our enrichment job runs. They measure disclosure and process, not whether a conclusion is correct. If you own this channel and believe a signal is mismeasured, tell us — the inputs are auditable and we will correct them.