Skip to content
</>Devs At Home
← All reviewers

Brutal Reviews

25 videos analysed · channel 1 years old · 2.4K subscribers

  • Rarely discloses gifted or sponsored units
  • High share of commercially influenced output
  • Describes rather than measures
  • Reviews at launch, rarely revisits
  • Channel less than a year old

Score breakdown

Each signal is scored 0–100 and multiplied by its published weight. The contributions sum to 5.

  • Disclosure

    0 × 25% = 0

    States plainly when a unit was gifted, paid for, or sponsored.

  • Methodology

    4 × 25% = 1

    Measures and tests rather than unboxing and describing.

  • Independence

    0 × 20% = 0

    Share of output that carries no commercial relationship.

  • Longevity

    10 × 10% = 1

    Revisits gear months later instead of reviewing once at launch.

  • Consistency

    0 × 10% = 0

    Publishes on a predictable cadence within a coherent subject.

  • Engagement

    34 × 10% = 3.4

    Audience discussion is proportionate and substantive for the reach.

The videos this score came from

Every phrase quoted below was found in that video's own title or description. Nothing here is inferred.

Scores are computed from public YouTube metadata by an open rubric and refreshed when our enrichment job runs. They measure disclosure and process, not whether a conclusion is correct. If you own this channel and believe a signal is mismeasured, tell us — the inputs are auditable and we will correct them.